New Research: Smog = 300 Cigarettes Daily
Not to be alarmist or anything, but some folks have been curious why non-smokers are getting smoker's diseases, like lung cancer. (A disease which kills 85% of patients within the first 5 years of diagnosis).
WaPo reports it starts with air pollutants known as free radicals (copper, iron, etc) that were previously thought to disperse in the atmosphere after being created by car exhaust, factory fumes, the homely hearth, etc.
But now they're saying these free radicals attach themselves to smog particles that are also created by car exhaust, factory fumes, the homely hearth, etc. So the free radicals live on for days. That's why they're called persistent free radicals. Meaning, as long as there's smog, there's also free radicals.
Where else can you get free radicals? In cigarettes. But lead researcher H. Barry Dellinger seems to fear the dangers of cigarettes are dwarfed by those of smog:
WaPo reports it starts with air pollutants known as free radicals (copper, iron, etc) that were previously thought to disperse in the atmosphere after being created by car exhaust, factory fumes, the homely hearth, etc.
But now they're saying these free radicals attach themselves to smog particles that are also created by car exhaust, factory fumes, the homely hearth, etc. So the free radicals live on for days. That's why they're called persistent free radicals. Meaning, as long as there's smog, there's also free radicals.
Where else can you get free radicals? In cigarettes. But lead researcher H. Barry Dellinger seems to fear the dangers of cigarettes are dwarfed by those of smog:
one would have to smoke about 300 cigarettes a day to be exposed to the same level of environmental free radicals found in moderately polluted air.I'm not sure what "moderately polluted air" means. I assume it's relative to first world cities that start warning their populations when PM-10 particle per cubic meter hit 50-60. So, perhaps "moderate" means 40? Santiago's smog goes untouched till about 200.
















6 Comments:
ok wait a second. I've said this before on an older post of yours. Los Angeles - the most air-polluted city in the US, which I know doesn't come close to Santiago - hits above 50 all the time and we don't get warnings about it.
In fact, I haven't heard a warning over air pollution since I was a kid...
I was just on the road and looking at how disgusting the smog is here, so you read my mind with this post. Thanks.
>>>Los Angeles - the most air-polluted city in the US
Wrong. Pittsburgh is the smoggiest.
>>>In fact, I haven't heard a warning over air pollution since I was a kid
Well, London Air Quality Network says pm-10 levels of 50+ are already moderate (in conjunction with ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide), and I've often heard of health advisories recommending children, elderly and people with respiratory conditions to cool their jets at that point. But the lack of intensive notification - why aren't smog levels reported as part of the hourly weather report, just like stocks are reported with the hourly newscast??? - shows that LA has a lot more first worlding to do.
>>>I was just on the road and looking at how disgusting the smog is here
Twice, 3x as thick is common in Santiago. Emergency levels are routine and on those days people flock to hospitals.
Glad I don't smoke! Imagine smoking 301 cigarettes daily!
I'm not proud of the fact that I've been a smoker since 1955 when I was 18 (koff) - however, I'm still here! It's interesting to know that smog is about 15 times as bad as my habit. Vancouver's fresh air is the answer!
I never thought I would be so excited for rain till I had to live through a Santiago winter. Now I can´t wait for rainy days to clear the "esmog".
to cachorrita: i know the feeling! i obsessively check the weather forecast to see when the next time it's going to rain is. i'm always crossing my fingers that it will be tomorrow.
right now it's sunny for the next ten days... i don't know if i can handle it.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home