Bathroom Birth & Inflation Offset: Chile Delivers
This week Chile's government apologized after a Peruvian woman couldn't hold it any longer and had to give birth in hospital bathroom, and Bachelet announced a relief package going to poorer Chileans to offset inflation, all of 45 bucks per family.
This is all very personal to me. I didn't realize the atrocious state of Chile's public hospitals, nor how dear a few dozen dollars are, until I got bit by a dog in Providencia, Santiago.
It was a couple years ago, I was walking on a sidewalk completely unaware that two kids and their chain-leashed mutt were proceeding on foot out of a private driveway hidden by one of those hateful Providencia hedge-rows.
A sharp, powerful stinging sensation on my left calf first clued me in to their presence, and was quickly followed by the dog's rapid-fire barking (as well as the sound of my own cursing).
Their mother brought out the iodine, my wound looked more like a ruddy scrape than anything, there was no missing flesh or dangling tendons, no sparkling tunnel vision brought on by severe blood loss.
Nevertheless I figured a check-up would make sense. She told me she wouldn't pay for me to go to a private clinic, but rather I'd have to go to a free public hospital (way to buck up, dog-owner).
I didn't know better, and so I actually went to the public hospital.
In the cement-floored waiting room, there were no lights on, but the afternoon sun poured in through huge bay windows, as well as the doors that were left open to provide relief from the sweltering heat.
These doors opened directly onto a parking lot. I could hear the popping sound of tires rolling over gravel and broken asphalt. This outside sound mixed together with inside sounds: distorted blaring from a lone TV monitor, babies crying and families, both poor and Peruvian, murmuring fearfully as they squished together on cracked, plastic airport seats lined up in rigid rows through the center of the room.
The receptionist, boxed off in a cube of Plexiglas, told me she had no idea how long I would wait, and honestly probably wouldn't get seen at all that day, considering my condition wasn't urgent.
(Not that urgent cases are always attended either, of course).
To the right of the receptionist's cube, a door swinged open occasionally to let stretchers or masked surgeons through. Peering beyond this door, I could see nothing but pure darkness.
I left.
Eventually, I dropped 40 bucks on a private clinic. It was clean, well lit, and comfortable. The doctor gave me the assurance I needed that I would be fine. Call it excessive, or prudent, but I think I was well within my bounds.
So I was irked, but not surprised, when the dog-owner flatly refused my request for reimbursement. In her mind the public hospital was somehow a viable option that I was free to avail myself of. When I told her "not really" she began screaming and hanged up. I think at a certain point she explained that 40 bucks was way outside of her tax bracket or something.
Somehow, of course, that doesn't explain how she pays for dog food.
Luckily for me, though, it was only 40 bucks.
But while her unwillingness to pay displays a craven lack of personal responsibility, it also speaks to her economic poverty, and that of Chile's so-called "middle class".
Put it this way: 40 bucks doesn't go that far in Santiago, but it's hard to come by. So to help offset inflation in Chile, President Michelle Bachelet is handing out 45 bucks per family. Assuming that means a family-of-four, that's under 12 bucks per person. One time only.
Call me a persistent pessimist, call me crazy, but I just can't get excited about this supposed boon to Chile's poorest. Bachelet has a history of half-assed gestures that do nothing to address the underlying class inequality in Chile, fundamental problems of human capital development and upward mobility seem to be hardly a priority.
Instead, she employs brazen, if heavily watered-down populism to boost her own popularity.
Last year she raised the minimum wage by approximately 16 cents per hour. This year she launched a shameful Ethical Wage dog-and-pony show. A couple weeks ago she padded poor peoples' retirement pensions barely squeeking them in over Chile's artificially low poverty line, soon she'll boast a virtual elimination of poverty, she's made equally ridiculous claims before.
Yes, strictly speaking, it is progress. But is it really better than nothing? I'd argue that it's worse. Token, bare-minimum gestures like these help take pressure off the president, yet preserve the status quo. Chile has the best economy in South America, but wealth distribution is the worst in the world.
This is all very personal to me. I didn't realize the atrocious state of Chile's public hospitals, nor how dear a few dozen dollars are, until I got bit by a dog in Providencia, Santiago.
It was a couple years ago, I was walking on a sidewalk completely unaware that two kids and their chain-leashed mutt were proceeding on foot out of a private driveway hidden by one of those hateful Providencia hedge-rows.
A sharp, powerful stinging sensation on my left calf first clued me in to their presence, and was quickly followed by the dog's rapid-fire barking (as well as the sound of my own cursing).
Their mother brought out the iodine, my wound looked more like a ruddy scrape than anything, there was no missing flesh or dangling tendons, no sparkling tunnel vision brought on by severe blood loss.
Nevertheless I figured a check-up would make sense. She told me she wouldn't pay for me to go to a private clinic, but rather I'd have to go to a free public hospital (way to buck up, dog-owner).
I didn't know better, and so I actually went to the public hospital.
In the cement-floored waiting room, there were no lights on, but the afternoon sun poured in through huge bay windows, as well as the doors that were left open to provide relief from the sweltering heat.
These doors opened directly onto a parking lot. I could hear the popping sound of tires rolling over gravel and broken asphalt. This outside sound mixed together with inside sounds: distorted blaring from a lone TV monitor, babies crying and families, both poor and Peruvian, murmuring fearfully as they squished together on cracked, plastic airport seats lined up in rigid rows through the center of the room.
The receptionist, boxed off in a cube of Plexiglas, told me she had no idea how long I would wait, and honestly probably wouldn't get seen at all that day, considering my condition wasn't urgent.
(Not that urgent cases are always attended either, of course).
To the right of the receptionist's cube, a door swinged open occasionally to let stretchers or masked surgeons through. Peering beyond this door, I could see nothing but pure darkness.
I left.
Eventually, I dropped 40 bucks on a private clinic. It was clean, well lit, and comfortable. The doctor gave me the assurance I needed that I would be fine. Call it excessive, or prudent, but I think I was well within my bounds.
So I was irked, but not surprised, when the dog-owner flatly refused my request for reimbursement. In her mind the public hospital was somehow a viable option that I was free to avail myself of. When I told her "not really" she began screaming and hanged up. I think at a certain point she explained that 40 bucks was way outside of her tax bracket or something.
Somehow, of course, that doesn't explain how she pays for dog food.
Luckily for me, though, it was only 40 bucks.
But while her unwillingness to pay displays a craven lack of personal responsibility, it also speaks to her economic poverty, and that of Chile's so-called "middle class".
Put it this way: 40 bucks doesn't go that far in Santiago, but it's hard to come by. So to help offset inflation in Chile, President Michelle Bachelet is handing out 45 bucks per family. Assuming that means a family-of-four, that's under 12 bucks per person. One time only.
Call me a persistent pessimist, call me crazy, but I just can't get excited about this supposed boon to Chile's poorest. Bachelet has a history of half-assed gestures that do nothing to address the underlying class inequality in Chile, fundamental problems of human capital development and upward mobility seem to be hardly a priority.
Instead, she employs brazen, if heavily watered-down populism to boost her own popularity.
Last year she raised the minimum wage by approximately 16 cents per hour. This year she launched a shameful Ethical Wage dog-and-pony show. A couple weeks ago she padded poor peoples' retirement pensions barely squeeking them in over Chile's artificially low poverty line, soon she'll boast a virtual elimination of poverty, she's made equally ridiculous claims before.
Yes, strictly speaking, it is progress. But is it really better than nothing? I'd argue that it's worse. Token, bare-minimum gestures like these help take pressure off the president, yet preserve the status quo. Chile has the best economy in South America, but wealth distribution is the worst in the world.
















12 Comments:
Amazing post.
Interesting interview with Felipe Harboe (you know him) today in El Mercurio. Not interesting because he talks about Douglas Tomkpins (which is another story), but because of what he says about him, especially in relation to his legal situation in Chile.
I want you to pay special attention to the following excerpts, because they apply to you:
-¿Es compatible la postura de referente ecologista, considerando que Douglas Tompkins tiene visa de turista?
"En Chile, el extranjero es bienvenido. Tenemos una política migratoria de puertas abiertas, siempre y cuando se cumplan las normas de extranjería y obviamente el respeto por el Estado de Derecho de nuestro país. En ese sentido, nos surge la siguiente preocupación: Douglas Tomkins ingresó al país en una oportunidad en el año 1992, después en 1994 y tiene un conjunto de salidas a la fecha. Y hasta el día de hoy, él tiene visa de turista. Creo que toda la ciudadanía ha observado las inversiones que él ha hecho, las acciones que está realizando y las opiniones que ha expresado. Razón por la cual, y si él ha manifestado la intención de quedarse en nuestro país, sería aconsejable que regularizara su situación migratoria tal como corresponde, con visa temporal o de residencia definitiva, según estime pertinente".
-¿Qué análisis tienen ustedes de la situación de Douglas Tompkins hoy en Chile?
"Hoy él está operando en nuestro país, lo cual es una cosa interesante... más allá de la libertad de expresión, que tiene cualquier ciudadano chileno o cualquier extranjero, no nos parece que se hagan juicios categóricos respecto de políticas internas de un gobierno ni que se realicen juicios respecto de autoridades públicas, cualquiera sea su color político. No dice relación con el color político, sino con la institucionalidad. El extranjero que está en nuestro país y que ha sido acogido como él, debe mantener cierta prudencia en sus declaraciones".
That last one:
El extranjero que está en nuestro país y que ha sido acogido como él, debe mantener cierta prudencia en sus declaraciones.
This is exactly what I've been warning you about on numerous occasions. If you wanna come here as a tourist, be my guest. If you wanna come here to criticize our country and our authorities publicly on a blog, while staying on a tourist visa, indefinitely, no, you're definitely not welcomed.
If you're going to be a tourist, act like a tourist: show some courtesy and respect and shut your mouth. If not, Mr. Harboe will gladly get your ass kicked out of this country.
Read the rest of the interview. It's filled with wonderful insights by Mr. Harboe that hit oh-so-close to home in your case.
You won't believe how tempted I am to email Mr. Harboe about this blog now.
Go ahead and comment on his blog. There's lotsa spam in the comments, you'll fit right in. But you're much more likely to reach him at his office.
I would be honored if he read my blog.
Especially my following response to the excerpts of his interview, that you were kind enough to reprint.
Harboe is talking out of his ass
If he respects foreigners' right to free speech, then why should they exercise a different degree of prudence? What law is he basing this off of?
None, of course. Clearly underlying his contradictory and mealy-mouthed pol-speak is a threat of intimidation by an extra-judicial abuse of power.
Bring it.
But ideologically speaking, even if Thompkins or me or any of the Santiago Times reporters (all on tourist visas) did suddenly get temporary visas, what difference would it make?
I mean, you can't possibly be claiming that your frothing anger toward me (or secret infatuation?) would disappear if I had a different kind of visa.
Face it, the sole reason you are upset is because I exercise free speech that happens to be offensive to you.
I know plenty of Chileans who express similar viewpoints as mine and get similar flak from their countrymen. The only difference is that, because I'm a foreigner, that's often the first thing that people reach for when trying to shout me down. In the case of Chileans who criticize Chile, their adversaries find other ways of discounting their personal validity (like calling Marcel Claude an "opinologo") and often end up saying the same dictatorship-era, culture-of-exile nonsense:
Porque no te vas?
(Though not in the same sentiment as the Los Prisioneros song, who sing "Por que no te vas" in order to criticize arriviste cuico fucks who brag about how much they love Europe).
Of course the real issue is that you, like Harboe, are trying to "get" your ideological opponent on a technicality. Your desperate, flailing attempt to throw the book at me shows the inherent weakness of your arguments, and your own self confidence.
You would resort to futile intimidation rather than address the issues that I raise. Your behavior outlines the strict definition of a loser:
Sniffling, wounded, passive-aggressive and, ultimately, ineffectual.
But back to the issues: what do you think of public hospitals, and the recent inflation offset? Are you even capable of advancing a comprehensive point of view that is at the very least tangentially relevant to the original blog entry? ;-)
Harboe's yesterday comments on El Mercurio have triggered a mini-earthquake at the center of the governing coalition, the Concertación. Senator Guido Girardi(*) is pissed and even threatening to abandon the coalition. He says:
"Yo he planteado una crítica muy dura al comité político. Yo no voy a aceptar esto, yo no apoyé a esta Concertación para que se transformara en una Concertación ideológica, que respalda políticas neoliberales, capitalismo salvaje y que no tiene ningún respeto por el medio ambiente. Yo estoy desconcertado con la Concertación y si sigue por ese camino mejor que la gente vote por la derecha".
"No voy a ser parte de un Gobierno que persigue a los ambientalistas. Ésa no es la Concertación que formamos."
And:
Asimismo, agregó que si hay problemas con Tompkins desde el punto de vista de su visa, "que lo arreglen con Tompkins, pero el tiene todo el derecho, independientemente de su status de turista o no, de criticar, de dar su punto de vista, y yo por lo menos le voy a pedir una reunión a la Presidenta" dijo el senador.
In short: The Deputy Interior Minister wants to really kick your ass, but a Senator is even threatening to leave the governing coalition if the authorities —basing their arguments on a technicality— don't stop harassing you and curtailing your right to free speech.
So you've got some friend and foes in Chile, little Will.
(*) Girardi is a corrupt senator and a major media whore.
Leftovers = dog food.
Come on Bachelet, give the dog a bone......handing out 45 bucks per family is ridiculous. It's completely asinine and comparable to when she had the idea of handing out the poorest families a box of literary classics.
Sure you get people to wag their tails temporarily and it's also better than absoulutely nothing, but instead she should be addressing the high prices of standard paperbacks and making some real change.
Harboe stays firm and won't back down. La Tercera is covering the controversy:
Harboe, de paso, mantuvo el llamado a "la prudencia" al ecologista ya que "no nos parece que una persona que está en condición de turista se ponga a criticar planes, programas o autoridades nacionales, sea del lado político que sea. Chile es un país que tiene dignidad".
And:
De paso anunció que se comunicará con la autoridad migratoria correspondiente para que "invite" a conversar al ecologista.
Sounds exciting!
This may very well decide your future in Chile, little Will. I can't wait to see how this all plays out.
It does sound exciting. I'd kill for one of those invitations. Sounds like Chile's come a long way since the Dictatorship. :P
Chileno should not worry about the “warnings” from the anonymous Chilean. I am Chilean and agree with Chileno’s opinions regarding political and economical matters of the motherland. Chileans that do not think Chile is almost a third world country and that its health system, lifestyle and wages are wonderful should take a little peek to a few developed countries and see what “development” is all about. Travelling is quite good to destroy misconceptions.
Excellent post Chileno, keep up the good work, ignore the critics of my mentally ill fellow countryman that obviously has something personal against you taking advantage of the lousy immigration laws of Chile. I personally think that is unfair that Chileans should not be allowed the same benefits in USA (considering we are neither terrorists nor Mexicans), but that has nothing to do with the validity of your opinions on Chile or with your personal integrity, it just shows you are clever and the idiots making the laws are not.
Cheers
Christian said "we are neither terrorists nor Mexicans". Great of you to defend Chileno in his right to critisize the country, would that be a racist comment? Perhaps you would assume Americans want Chileans any more than Mexicans in the country? Mexicans are equally screwed by such laws, but the United States loves their tax paying, social security card and driver license holding, hard-working ILLEGAL immigrant workers. I also lived "illegally" on a tourist visa, in Mexico, coming and going as I pleased (or rather as I had to to renew the visa). Our brown skinned neigbors don't have that priveledge.
Good to know you are doing your bit for the Chilean economy. What are the public hospitals in the US like BTW?
And why do you think the dog bit you?
Wembley
What a bully this Harboe guy sounds like...I agree that everyone is entitled to their opinion no matter what their visa status is, that's bullshit. Tompkins has done a lot of good in this poor, short-sighted country and that makes many Chileans envious (cuándo no).
As long as he doesn't harm anyone, what's the big deal?! And even if he does, it's really embarrassing to read that someone in Harboe's position answers back that "Chile es un país que tiene dignidad"...la misma que acaba de mandar al diablo con una frase tan patética.
Saludos de parte mía, que SÍ SOY CHILENA DE TOMO Y LOMO MIERDA.
What a great post Chileno. And the dude who posted about the interview with Felipe Harboe made it that much better. Right after they throw Tompkins en la cana, they are going to track "chileno" down. Jajajajajajajajajajajajajajaja.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home