Hispanic Voters & US Elections: Blond Fetish or Blatino Love?
The Times Online reveals that as Hispanic votes play an important part in the 24-state Super² Tuesday primary election, Chile once again has wedged its way into US politics. In courting Latin voters for Hillary Clinton's presidential bid, President Bill Clinton:
Chi-chi-chi! Le-le-le!
Anyway Clinton, famous himself for pit-stops at McDonalds on his morning jogs (or was that just an SNL skit?), ducked into a local picada in downtown Santiago on a visit to Chile while in office, and ever since it has borne his name.
So when he says "neighbors to the south" he knows what he's talking about. Except that it kinda ends there. He seems conveniently unaware of the real and imagined problems of electing female president in a sexist society:
Chile elected a female president to give itself a progressive veneer, then proceeded to trample on her for the failed policies of her predecessor, a man the country cowered under. That's one analysis. But really that's a whole different discussion.
Point is, according to the article, Mr. Clinton is tapping into a perceived tendency for this demographic inside the US to vote woman because, like, all Latins love the Virgin Mary or something.
Or, as the article also suggests, it might be because they hate blacks:
Sure it's a stretch to say that Clinton's "neighbors to the south" = "white neighbors to the south". But you gotta admit that the word "blatino" just isn't something you here much of in these parts. (Please refer to the fascinating discussion of blacks in Chile in the comments there).
Indeed, in many other parts of Latin America there is a huge black population. And of course it's a veritable paradise where white Latins hold hands and sing with black Latins and Asian Latins, and everyone wears flowers in their hair:
There's no limit to the number of interpretations. You could even say that I invented the Times Online article as a proxy for my "racist" ideas. In fact, here's one more: you forgot to take your medication.
...cited, approvingly, “our neighbours in the south” where Latin America’s matriarchal societies have already produced women presidents in Argentina and Chile.Gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooal!
Chi-chi-chi! Le-le-le!
Anyway Clinton, famous himself for pit-stops at McDonalds on his morning jogs (or was that just an SNL skit?), ducked into a local picada in downtown Santiago on a visit to Chile while in office, and ever since it has borne his name.
So when he says "neighbors to the south" he knows what he's talking about. Except that it kinda ends there. He seems conveniently unaware of the real and imagined problems of electing female president in a sexist society:
Chile elected a female president to give itself a progressive veneer, then proceeded to trample on her for the failed policies of her predecessor, a man the country cowered under. That's one analysis. But really that's a whole different discussion.
Point is, according to the article, Mr. Clinton is tapping into a perceived tendency for this demographic inside the US to vote woman because, like, all Latins love the Virgin Mary or something.
Or, as the article also suggests, it might be because they hate blacks:
There have, however, been hints of a more sinister secret to her support. Sergio Bendixen, a Clinton pollster, recently gave public voice to a view previously only whispered. “The Hispanic voter — and I want to say this very carefully — has not shown a lot of willingness or affinity to support black candidates,” he told The New Yorker magazine.And then you might also ponder whether it was purely coincidence that Clinton would nod to two of the "whitest" countries in South America. This, after all, is the same guy who's been condemned for using codified, racial language, doing his best to turn Hope Obama into Angry Black Obama.
Sure it's a stretch to say that Clinton's "neighbors to the south" = "white neighbors to the south". But you gotta admit that the word "blatino" just isn't something you here much of in these parts. (Please refer to the fascinating discussion of blacks in Chile in the comments there).
Indeed, in many other parts of Latin America there is a huge black population. And of course it's a veritable paradise where white Latins hold hands and sing with black Latins and Asian Latins, and everyone wears flowers in their hair:
Others have suggested a more subtle dynamic. Rodolfo de la Garza, at Columbia University in New York, says that Hispanics have little need for the redemption that support for Mr Obama offers liberal whites. “Latinos,” he says, “have not been the ones persecuting blacks.”Sure...
There's no limit to the number of interpretations. You could even say that I invented the Times Online article as a proxy for my "racist" ideas. In fact, here's one more: you forgot to take your medication.
















5 Comments:
Yeah who was the one who thought up the Transantiago idea? And then who got blamed for it...
I hope the U.S. doesn't elect Hilary and then try to say that she invented the concept of war on Iraq. Although she did vote for it.
-K
Remember, some Chileans and along with their mainstream media, they tend to see themselves as white and then as brown when it is convenient.
nice blog. chi chi chi
Blatino? What's that?
@Kyle: much more than voting for the war, Hillary Clinton is a craven enabler. She is a fearsome hawkette in the warring Clinton-Bush dynasty:
Bill Clinton made Regime Change the official policy of the US in 1998 - remember that bombing campaign when you were in high school/middle school?
The world has given Bush his fair share of blame for the war. The Clintons haven't gotten enough. And Hillary recently went with bush in voting to designate the Iranian
National Guard a terrorist organization. Hillary will deserve all the blame for combat deaths when she stalls on pulling troops out and prosecutes bombing campaigns or worse against Iran.
And Bachelet puts a kinder face on Concertacionismo which is an extension of the military dictatorship. She hates the poor and deserves everything she's getting. It's just that Lagos deserved it too, but according to one chilena I talked to about this the uprisings in society is because there's not a firm father figure to keep everyone in line and everyone's acting up because daddy's gone.
I'm all for Chileans acting up because a lot needs to be changed but if it's only because they can get away with it because it's a Mommy-at-home night and that characterization of Chilean society as that sexist and infantile holds up then that's pathetic.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home