Chile Blog | Press | Praise | Living in Chile

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Escape!

Escape, Chilean Exit Sign

In line at a subterranean Banco Santander in one of the more elevated neighborhoods of Santiago, there are no ropes to cordon off patrons into a twisty snaky pattern, just a vast open expanse of white floor tiles interspersed with thin red tiles suggesting the pattern of the line. A shocking appeal to personal responsibility. Pure class.

Who knows that the ropes don't come out on payday, but for now it was fun to believe. Anyway, there was hardly anyone in line. Ahead of us was a mother standing in line and disapproving of, but hardly hindering, every action of her little boy who was sprawled out on the white-tile floor with a hot wheels tractor and three race cars.

"Are you on the beach?" asked his Mother? "Get off from the floor, it's dirty!" she said without budging from her place in line. The boy pretty much ignored her.

After a few minutes of this one-sided back-and-forth the kid split, heading across the vast, white-tiled expanse to the stairway bathed in Winter White Light of Morning that was tumbling in from the Outside, promising Freedom.

Without budging from her place in line, mother called out desperately for him to return. The boy's escape didn't escape the security guard's notice, who signaled to the Mother that everything was under control. The boy, upon reaching for the first hot, sunbaked granite step, met with two black boots that slammed down in front of him. Turning his gaze upward he saw the looming figure of Authority, and he laughed at it. But the guard wasn't phased by the kid's insolence. The guard spoke gently:

"Keep walking up those stairs and you will find a police officer waiting to arrest you." Kindly tipping his hat to the Mother, he resumed his post near the tellers. The boy returned to his mother, completely terrorized.

That's gotta be one of the most endearing examples of post-dictatorial fear tactics to date. I won't say that the same scene wouldn't repeat itself in another country; manipulation based upon the fear of authority isn't unique to Chile. But it is very Chilean, because Chile did suffer from a brutal dictatorship and still hasn't recovered.

Psychologically, Chile still needs to heal. Besides making people happier, healing would also make Chile a lot more functional. In Paul Theroux's Letter from Turkmenistan, he describes visiting the capital of that country which was still under the rule of a lunatic dictator who died around the same time Pinochet died, at the end of 2006. Entering Turkmenistan, Theroux describes a two hour nonsensical ordeal at customs in an airport "which was staffed by officials with a very slim idea of how to do their jobs -- a characteristic common to officials in most dictatorships, where fear of retribution inspires indecision and incompetence."

I see this in Chile all the time. Certainly not a 1:1 with the sitch in Turkmenistan, but the similarities are striking. For example: recently a Chilean student appealing a denied re-entrance to the University of Chile was told to wait 3 days for a final response from the Chancellor, who had the petition on his desk. Three weeks passed. The official responsible for sending this request had refused to follow up, even when prodded by the student. The reason? In his words: "I'm afraid the Chancellor will call me a fool for asking a second time".

Afraid of retribution. What kind of retribution? Being ridiculed. Timid, and ultimately incompetent since it was his responsibility to follow through, he's not a "dumb Chilean" but rather a victim of psychological repression, in my humble opinion. His fear renders him incompetent, and therefore negatively affects the lives of others (in this case the student seeking re-entrance to the University).

Chile needs escape from the blemishes of its past by fully acknowledging and reckoning with its past. Only then will it see a reduction in incompetence caused by fear. In other words, Chile needs to heal.
 

4 Comments:

At 2:21 PM, Anonymous Faithfull Lurker said...

Generaly speaking parents (not just those in Chile) have become rather passive nowadays when in regards to raising their children. See if the mother had her little boy under control he would not doing stunts like that. Just one stern look from his mother and the brat immediately knows she means business.

 
At 11:00 AM, Blogger tomasdinges said...

Maybe parents are passive, or there are just bad parents...very different from the viejos del pasado...but Im not sure why kids are allowed to run wild these days.. But still being stern...having kids under control makes me think of...and is not necessarily the answer...hence my snide commentary below.

Kind of like Pinochet...right...the stern father...right??

"under control"= detention, dissapearance, torture...

Was it a red truck?

"stern look"= threat to do it again.

Why cant a kid run around on the floor, germs are good, and toys with wheels love slick surfaces, kind of like my dream of skateboarding down the halls of my high school.

 
At 1:47 PM, Anonymous Chileno said...

>>>"under control"= detention, dissapearance, torture...

That's what I call good parenting. No man, the "Tata" was totally a paternal figure for Chile, the stern father. He punished those who misbehaved, and, like any stern father of 18 little brats, there was bound to be some collateral damage.

Obviously that woman was a bad parent, and the security guard was a good rent-a-cop. He knows nobody can take him seriously, much less a little pendejo, so he was well prepared with that Red Truck story.

Sinister and effective.

I wasn't going to extrapolate much from my story but now I find myself doing so:

It's like a metaphor. (Was that sentence a simile?) Anyway, here goes: the mother and the child are the People of Chile, and the rent-a-cop is the Military Junta, or perhaps post MJ fear. Anyway, as in any authoritarian regime people lose the conception of personal responsibility. The mother can't even take care of her own kid so she let's the State do it. The State's methods are brutal and intimidating. If this were like a metaphor for the actual regime era, then it would be more apt if the rent-a-cop actually picked up the kid, doused him in kerosene and burned him alive in front of his mother.

But I think the effects of Example setting have lasted nearly 20 years beyond the dictatorship, so it's unnecessary to violently repress, just hint at it. That's far more efficient, and still works.

I'm not too interested in discussing "little brats" here, I'm sure there's a good Parenting blog where we could take that discussion. THAT SAID, I think it's strange how anemic that mother was. Don't know why she's like that, could be the amorality of Consumerism or a million other reasons. So I think it works better as like a metaphor for lack of personal responsibility caused by totalitarianism.

That's why Chile's so goddamn dysfunctional. It could be because people are stupid or uneducated, but I think it's got a lot more to do with unhealed psychological repression and lack of personal responsibility or accountability.

 
At 3:34 PM, Anonymous Faithfull Lurker said...

Parents today are very different, from the "viejos" of yore. Many of the older generation had nothing to do with Pinochet since they followed the rigid, socially correct civil code in place before before he ever came into power. The passiveness and unruliness is a leftover from the "Flower" generation. This is a world phenomenon, more visible in some places than others. When the youth of the late 60's and 70's had kids of their own they never instilled much civility in their offspring. They did not teach one important lesson; Every action has a reaction. The line was blurred, between which actions have consequences and which merit positive encouragement. This is why many people in their 30s and 20's exhibit many peculiar behaviours not found in previous generations. Now those 30-somethings are parents themselves are having practicaly little or no say in how their own children are brought up. They let the ipod, internet,cellphones, and video games do all the child raising for them. There is nothing wrong with technology but many of these children are the most anti-social beings, they are more likely to be obese. I grew up in the early 1990's with the internet boom and all the new technology poping up. Still many of us still found time to play outside with other kids and ride our bikes together. We even played the video games together with at least another person. The generation after us is very dysfunctional.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


Download Skype, Call Chile!

Apple Store

ComFi Phone Cards